cpespec2.pdf

(211 KB) Pobierz
cpe_spec_paper2
CONTENTS
Paper 2 Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
Task Types in Paper 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
Sample Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
Task Specific Mark Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
Sample Scripts with Examiner Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
11181467.002.png
PAPER 2 WRITING
General Description
Answering
Paper Format
Candidates write their answers in a question booklet.
The paper contains two parts.
Timing
Number of Tasks
2 hours.
Candidates are required to carry out two tasks; a compulsory
one in Part 1 and one from a choice of four in Part 2.
Marks
Each question in the paper carries equal marks.
Task Types
From the following: an article, a proposal, a report, a review,
an essay, a letter.
Part Task Type and Focus
Number of tasks
Task Format
and length
1 Candidates are expected to write within the One compulsory task
A contextualised writing task giving
following formats:
candidates guidance to the context through
• an article
instructions and one short text which may be
supported by visual prompts.
• an essay
300–350 words
• a letter
• a proposal
Discursive – presenting and developing
arguments, expressing and supporting
opinions, evaluating ideas etc.
2 Candidates are expected to write within the Four questions from
A contextualised writing task specified
following formats for questions 2 to 4:
which candidates
in no more than 70 words.
• an article
choose one.
One of the choice
• a letter
includes a question on
• a proposal
each of three set texts.
• a review
• a report
300–350 words
Candidates are expected to write within
the following formats for question 5:
• an article
• an essay
• a letter
• a review
• a report
Describing, persuading, narrating,
evaluating, making recommendations,
giving information, summarising etc.
11181467.003.png
TASK TYPES IN PAPER 2
The following are brief definitions of the task types which
candidates are expected to be able to produce for Paper 2.
with clear sections. Candidates may wish to use appropriate
section headings, as used in authentic proposals.
Article
Review
Candidates are asked to produce a piece of writing on a
particular topic or theme in a style which would make it
suitable for publication in a newspaper, magazine, journal or
newsletter. They are given a prompt which they then use to
perform the task. The target audience is indicated, as this
influences the appropriacy of the register and tone of the
article, for example, how lively or how academic it should
be. An article will often include some description and
narrative, as both serve to engage the reader. An article will
usually be motivated by a central idea which provides a
point or purpose to the writing or reading of the article.
A review may be about a book, film or play, but it may also
be about a restaurant, hotel, etc. The readership is clearly
specified in the task outline so that candidates write in an
appropriate register. In addition to providing some
information on, for example, plot and characters, candidates
should indicate some judgement on the subject of the
review. The review may embody narrative, as well as
descriptive and evaluative language, and a range of
vocabulary relating, for example, to literature and the media
such as cinema or TV.
ASSESSMENT
Essay
An impression mark is awarded to each piece of writing
using the general mark scheme on the following page. All
tasks carry the same maximum mark.
Candidates are expected to use the prompt material to
produce a composition on a relevant topic. The essay should
be complete in itself containing an introduction, body and
conclusion and be united by a central idea which provides a
point and purpose to the writing and reading of the essay.
The general impression mark scheme is used in conjunction
with a task-specific mark scheme, which focuses on criteria
specific to each task. For examples of task-specific mark
schemes, see pages 30-32.
Letter
At CPE-level, formal letters are the most suitable. An
example is a letter to a newspaper giving an opinion and
making a point, stimulated by the input given and further
developed with the candidate’s own ideas. The letter may
include narrative sections to illustrate a point and interest the
reader. A letter in Part 2 could have a narrative focus, for
example, a letter of complaint about an event which has not
lived up to the candidate’s expectations.
Marking
Each piece of writing is assigned to a band between 0 and 5,
as described on the following page, and can be awarded one
of three performance levels within that band. For example,
in Band 4, 4.1 represents weaker performance within Band
4; 4.2 represents typical performance within Band 4; 4.3
represents strong performance within Band 4. ‘Acceptable’
performance at CPE level is represented by a band of 3.
Report
Candidates are given an appropriate prompt, in response to
which they then have to produce a report for a specified
audience, which could be a superior, e.g. a boss at work, or a
peer group, e.g. colleagues. A report involves the presentation
and interpretation in well-organised prose of information in
relation to a specified context; this is drawn from the prompt
material and from the candidates’ own ideas. Candidates may
wish to use appropriate section headings, as used in authentic
reports. Narrative tenses will be used in the report.
Length
300 to 350 words are asked for. Candidates producing very
short scripts will be penalised.
Spelling and Punctuation
These are important aspects of accuracy and must be taken into
account. American spelling and usage is acceptable.
Paragraphing
Proposal
This is a function of organisation and format. The task-
specific mark scheme will give an indication to examiners of
what is expected.
A proposal has a similar format to the report. Whereas the
report is an account of something which has happened, the
focus of the proposal is on the future, with the main focus
being on making recommendations for discussion. An example
of a proposal would be a bid for funds for a project (described
in the task), and would entail outlining the way the funds
would be spent, the benefits which would accrue, and the
way progress would be monitored and evaluated if the bid
were to be successful. Proposals should be well structured
Handwriting
If handwriting interferes with communication without
preventing it, the candidate will be penalised. Totally
illegible scripts receive 0.
Please note that the following general mark scheme is a draft
version only.
11181467.004.png
Draft General Mark Scheme
This mark scheme is interpreted at CPE level and is used in
conjunction with a task specific mark scheme for each
question.
Outstanding realisation of the task set:
• Sophisticated use of an extensive range of vocabulary, collocation and expression, entirely appropriate to the task set
• Effective use of stylistic devices; register and format wholly appropriate
5 • Impressive use of a wide range of structures
• Skilfully organised and coherent
• Excellent development of topic
• Virtually error-free
Impresses the reader and has a very positive effect.
Good realisation of the task set:
• Fluent and natural use of a wide range of vocabulary, collocation and expression, successfully meeting the
requirements of the task set
• Good use of stylistic devices; register and format wholly appropriate
4 • Competent use of a wide range of structures
• Well organised and coherent
• Good and ambitious development of topic
• Minor and unobtrusive errors, arising from attempts at complex language
Has a positive effect on the reader.
Satisfactory realisation of the task set:
• Reasonably fluent and natural use of a range of vocabulary and expression, adequate to the task set
• Evidence of stylistic devices; register and format generally appropriate
3 • Adequate range of structures
• Clearly organised and generally coherent
• Adequate, though unambitious, coverage of topic
• Occasional non-impeding errors
Achieves the desired effect on the reader.
Inadequate attempt at the task set:
• Limited and/or inaccurate range of vocabulary and expression
• Little evidence of stylistic devices; some attempt at register and format
2 • Inadequate range of structures
• Some attempt at organisation, but lacks coherence
• Inadequate development of topic
• A number of errors, which sometimes impede communication
Has a negative effect on the reader.
Poor attempt at the task set:
• Severely limited and inaccurate range of vocabulary and expression
• No evidence of stylistic devices; little or no attempt at register and format
1 • Lack of structural range
• Poorly organised, leading to incoherence
• Little relevance to topic, and/or too short
• Numerous errors, which distract and often impede communication
Has a very negative effect on the reader.
Negligible or no attempt at the task set:
• Totally incomprehensible due to serious error
0 • Totally irrelevant
• Insufficient language to assess (fewer than 20% of the required number of words)
• Totally illegible
A maximum of 3 points can be awarded within each of Bands 1–5.
11181467.005.png
11181467.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin