Hydrangea-paniculata.pdf

(1841 KB) Pobierz
Layout_01
RHS PLANT TRIALS BULLETIN
RHS PLANT TRIALS BULLETIN
Number 23 December 2008
Number 23 December 2008
Hydrangea paniculata
Hydrangea paniculata
Neil Lancaster
Botanist, RHS Garden Wisley
Neil Lancaster
Botanist, RHS Garden Wisley
Wendy Wesley
Trials Officer, RHS Garden Wisley
Wendy Wesley
Trials Officer, RHS Garden Wisley
699410458.010.png
The RHS Trial of Hydrangea paniculata
Backgroundtothetrial
Although Hydrangea paniculata has been cultivated in
European gardens for well over a century, for most of that
period there has been little choice beyond a handful of
very early introductions. H. paniculata , the panicled
hydrangea, has invariably played second fiddle to the more
colourful H. macrophylla , or hortensia, even though it is
generally easier to grow and more reliably hardy. The first
edition of Michael Haworth-Booth’s The Hydrangeas ,
published in 1950, included over 300 hortensias, but only
3 types of H. paniculata , namely the cultivars ‘Floribunda’,
‘Grandiflora’ and ‘Praecox’.
H. paniculata inthewildandin
cultivation
H. paniculata is native of cool temperate and sub-tropical
regions of Japan, China and Sakhalin, where it grows as a
deciduous shrub or small tree to 8m in height, at altitudes
to about 1300m. It is often stated to be a very variable
species in the wild, but not all authors agree on this.
H. paniculata was first described and named in 1829 by the
German physician and botanist Philipp Franz von Siebold
while working for the Dutch East India Company based on
Deshima Island within Nagasaki harbour, Japan. Granted
limited access to the mainland to carry out his medical
duties, at a time when other foreigners were excluded,
Siebold used the opportunity to collect and describe the
native plants, including H. paniculata . Siebold’s
determination to explore this closed country eventually
resulted in him falling foul of the authorities and he was
banished from Japan before the plant could be exported to
Europe. Fortunately, he was allowed to return 30 years
later, when he succeeded in sending back the cultivated
form of H. paniculata now known as ‘Grandiflora’. This
cultivar, also known as the pee gee hydrangea, is probably
still the most widely grown.
After the 1950s, the range of cultivars started to increase
with the appearance of the first de Belder introductions
and slowly gathered pace in the 1970s and 1980s as new
generations of seedlings were raised from existing cultivars.
Because of the long lead-time for raising and introducing
new plants, only eight cultivars could be listed in the first
edition of the RHS Plant Finder in 1987. A decade on, there
were still only twelve cultivars, four of the early de Belder
selections having become more widely available, but
subsequent years saw a more rapid increase. In the past 10
years, interest in H. paniculata has taken off with many
promising new introductions from breeders in Belgium,
Holland, France and the USA.
Other early introductions from Japan include ‘Floribunda’,
discovered by Carl Maximowicz in a Japanese nursery in
the 1860s, ‘Praecox’, raised from seeds collected on
Hokkaido Island by Charles Sargent in 1897, and ‘Kyushu’,
introduced as a wild-collected seedling from Kyushu Island
by Collingwood Ingram in 1926.
With so many new cultivars coming on to the market, the
RHS decided to hold a trial to compare the new cultivars
with the old and to select the best ones for the Award of
Garden Merit. More than 40 cultivars were assembled in a
trial that was considered by many of those involved to be
among the most successful woody plant trials yet
undertaken by the RHS. At the same time, the first Eurotrials
were conducted in the UK, France, Germany and Holland,
providing an interesting opportunity to compare trial results
between different sites and growing conditions.
In the 1950s, at the embryonic Kalmthout Arboretum and
later at Hemelrijk, Robert and Jelena de Belder began to
experiment with raising and selecting seedlings of
H. paniculata , derived initially from an old plant in their
garden of ‘Floribunda’. The first and most famous of these,
Front cover:
Hydrangea paniculata
‘Limelight’
Right: Hydrangea
paniculata Trial
August 2008
2
RHS Plant Trials Bulletin
699410458.011.png 699410458.012.png
Inflorescence of Hydrangea paniculata
showing pink late season colour
‘Unique’, was reputedly the sole survivor of a batch of
young seedlings that had been ravaged by blackbirds. It
turned out to be an exceptional plant whose offspring
yielded many good new cultivars, including ‘Papillon’,
‘White Lace’, P INK D IAMOND , ‘Burgundy Lace’, ‘Brussels
Lace’, ‘White Moth’, ‘Green Spire’ and ‘Melody’. Further
generations were raised in the 1970s and 1980s by open
pollination of these plants, with P INK D IAMOND and ‘White
Moth’, in particular, producing some notable cultivars. The
arboretum at Hemelrijk still contains many unnamed
plants, and seeds from these are still collected and
distributed to nurseries in the hope of raising new cultivars.
Breeders in Europe and the USA have built upon the de
Belder legacy, producing cultivars with inflorescences of
subtly different shapes and shades of pink, white and
green, as well as cultivars of more compact habit. Some of
the most striking new cultivars have been raised by Peter
Zwijnenburg at Boskoop, including ‘Big Ben’, ‘Phantom’,
‘Limelight’, ‘Dolly’, ‘Silver Dollar’ and ‘Pink Lady’, while
significant contributions have also come from Darthuizer
in the Netherlands and Michael Dirr in the USA.
As a garden plant, H. paniculata has a number of
advantages over H. macrophylla . It is relatively drought-
tolerant, does well in both full sun and partial shade and
grows in acid or alkaline soil, as long as the ground is well-
drained. Importantly, it is very hardy (to about -30˚C in
the USA) and as it always flowers on the current season’s
wood, it is not susceptible to late spring frosts.
BotanicalDescription
Hydrangea paniculata is a deciduous woody plant with
serrate leaves arranged in opposite pairs or clusters of
three, and flower heads made up of showy, sterile flowers
mixed with smaller, fertile flowers. What sets it apart from
other species is the structure of the inflorescence, which is
typically a cone-shaped panicle. The only other Hydrangea
that has flowers arranged in a panicle is H. arborescens and
that is distinguished by having lobed leaves.
Habit: In the wild may be a lax shrub to about 2m or a
small tree to 8m.
Shoots: Somewhat brittle. Downy at first, becoming
hairless.
Leaves: Elliptic or ovate, serrate, acuminate, rounded or
tapered at the base, 7.5 – 15cm long and about half as
wide. Arranged in opposite pairs, or in 3’s. Sparsely
pubescent above and on the veins below.
Flowers: A mixture of small, yellowish fertile flowers and
long-lasting (up to about 8 weeks) sterile flowers with 4 or
5 white sepals, usually entire, often ageing to pink or
purplish-pink, particularly on the underside. Flowers are
borne in panicles on the current season’s growth, opening
from the base toward the apex of the panicle. The ovary is
semi-inferior.
Fruit: A many-seeded capsule. The seeds have no dormancy
and typically germinate in 2 to 4 weeks.
Hydrangea paniculata
3
699410458.013.png 699410458.001.png
The Trial
AwardofGardenMerit(AGM)
Objectives
To compare and assess new and old cultivars
To recommend the Award of Garden Merit to those
considered to be the best
To determine correct nomenclature
To obtain specimens, photographs, and descriptions as a
record to be held in the RHS Herbarium at Wisley
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Big Ben’ AGM(H4) 2008
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Floribunda’ AGM H4) 1993*
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Grandiflora’ AGM(H4) 1993*
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Kyushu’
AGM (H4) 1993
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Limelight’ PBR
AGM(H4) 2008
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Phantom’
AGM(H4) 2008
Records
Habit
Response to pruning
Stem colour
Foliage colour (summer and autumn)
Flowering period
Inflorescence shape
Flower colour (early, mid-season and late season)
Hydrangea paniculata
AGM(H4) 1993
P INK D IAMOND ‘Interhydia’
Hydrangea paniculata
AGM(H4) 2008
P INKY -W INKY ‘Dvppinky’ PBR
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Silver Dollar’ AGM(H4) 2008
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Unique’
AGM (H4) 1993*
* Recommended to be rescinded at the AGM Review
in 2012
Entries
68 entries, representing 47 cultivars, were submitted by
gardens, nurserymen and individuals in the UK,
Netherlands, Belgium and the USA. Details of each cultivar
are given in the Selection Table below.
The following will receive an Award of Garden Merit
when available to the public
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Dolly’
Hydrangea paniculata ‘Pink Lady’
Cultivation
Three plants of each entry were planted in May 2004. All
plants were cut down to the base after planting. The plants
were grown in the open, with no shade, and watered only
during periods of drought. Soil analyses were conducted
annually and treatments applied as necessary to eliminate
nutrient deficiencies and maintain approximately neutral
conditions.
Hardiness rating
H4 = hardy throughout the British Isles
JudgingCriteria
The Woody Plant Trials Subcommittee assessed
entries in the trial for the Award of Garden Merit
using the following criteria:
Habit
Bud / Flower / Faded flower
Floppiness of head
Foliage
Pruning
All plants were pruned each year in late March. The three
plants of each cultivar were used to test three pruning
regimes:
1 Hard pruning (to two buds)
2 Moderate pruning (to four buds)
3 Light pruning (removal of previous year’s flowerheads
only)
The AGM is only awarded to plants that are:
Excellent for garden decoration
Available from nurseries
Reasonably resistant to pests and diseases
Of good constitution
Essentially stable in form and colour
Reasonably easy to grow
Hydrangea paniculata Trial September 2007
4
RHS Plant Trials Bulletin
699410458.002.png 699410458.003.png
Light
Moderate
Hard
1 Hard pruning (to two buds)
Where there was a response to pruning, the lightly pruned
plants were the first to flower and carried more, smaller
flowers than the hard-pruned plants, which flowered later,
and bore larger, fewer panicles. Those plants subjected to
moderate pruning were intermediate in panicle size and
time of flowering. Although the hard-pruned plants tended
to grow with added vigour, their larger flowerheads were not
always advantageous, sometimes producing panicles that
could not be supported and flopped.
February
March
April
2 Moderate pruning (to four buds)
A further pruning demonstration using spare plants was set
up in which three plants of each cultivar were medium-
pruned at the end of February, March and April. Delaying
pruning was found to delay flowering, as illustrated above.
3 Light pruning (removal of previous year’s
flowerheads only)
Both techniques proved to be of interest, the first
producing varying bloom size and a flowering delay, the
second bringing forward or delaying flowering so as to
provide a succession of blooms. Either could be used to
extend the period of flowering for group plantings. It may
also be worth trying more than one technique on the
different stems of a single plant, though this was not
attempted during the trial period.
Hydrangea paniculata
5
699410458.004.png 699410458.005.png 699410458.006.png 699410458.007.png 699410458.008.png 699410458.009.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin