Translating Humor across Cultures: Verbal Humor in Animated Films
Laura- Karolina Gáll
Partium Christian University, Oradea
Humour and translation
Humour plays an important role in the context of intercultural communication. One of the means for exporting humor across cultures is television. This predominant medium of mass entertainment features a diversity of programs, mainly of Anglo-American origins, in which humour plays a minor, or major role.
Partly universal, partly individual, and at the same time rooted in a specific cultural and linguistic context, humour poses a real challenge for translators. When translating humour a number of factors need to be taken into consideration. Besides having to decide whether the target language reader understands the humour, translators also have to render the humour-inducing effect of the source text. They have to make source humour function as humour in the target culture. Translators’ ability to make creative decisions is often tested by culturally bound elements and language-specific devices.
Verbally expressed humor is among the most difficult to translate. As opposed to referential humour, verbal humour is often viewed as untranslatable due to its language dependent quality. Translators are often faced with the seemingly impossible task of translating verbal humor while keeping as much as possible of its informational and pragmatic content and, at the same time, producing a similar effect as it would provoke in the source language culture. Raphaelson-West (130) illustrates the difficulty that lies at the basis of translating verbal humor relying on the following pun: “Linguistic jokes are punny as hell.” She argues that "In order to translate the joke it would be necessary to have an idiomatic expression about humour which contained a word which rhymed with a word which means something about puns or language. This word which means something linguistic would have to be similar to the word it rhymes with, and its presence would have to add a little meaning to the sentence." It is highly unlikely, however, for languages to comply with such a number of conditions. Consequently, the good quality of the translation depends largely on the creativity of translators.
Subtitling and dubbing
The already challenging task translators are assigned with when translating verbal humor is further intensified when dealing with verbally expressed humor in the context of audiovisual translation. Ciaro argues that “no matter how complex issues concerning the translation of written and spoken instances of VEH [verbally expressed humour] may be, they are relatively simple when compared to the intricacy of having to translate them when they occur within a text created to be performed on screen.” Translating verbal humour in the audiovisual context is indeed a demanding process due to the fact that, in addition to the cultural and language factors, the translator's scope is also bound by the visual and audial aspect of the medium. Therefore, when it comes to rendering the humour of the source language the translator’s choice is limited by audial and visual cues which cannot be manipulated. Though, dubbing replaces source language on the soundtrack with target language, source-culture oriented visual feedback might still make a target-culture oriented translation solution impossible, and consequently make humour impossible to translate.
Viewers’ expectation that the translator remains faithful to the source text is another aspect to the translator’s delicate job of aiding the target culture in capturing the humour. While being under a variety of constrains the translator is also supposed to make the least possible changes to the source version. This feature affects subtitling where the source language and the target language are simultaneously present. While in the case of dubbing viewers awareness of a divergent or possible incorrect translation is suppressed, according to Shochat and Stam (qtd. in Jaskanen, Reality Bites 7) “subtitles offer the pretext for a linguistic game of ‘spot the error’” especially for those viewers who have a command of both languages. Consequently, the subtitler is often faced with the often impossible task to keep to the source language version and at the same time render the humour that cannot be rendered by a source-culture oriented translation solution. Finding a compromise, a solution that might function for the target language audience in a maximally similar way as the original did for the source language audience and still not deviate too much from the source language version might prove to be an especially thorny issue, and on a number of occasion an impossible task The next section investigates the way Romanian subtitlers and Hungarian dubbing translators set out to complete this demanding mission.
Translation procedures and strategies
Once it comes to discussing translation strategies there is one universal aspect that is treated in all the different approaches, thus it cannot be left unaccounted for in the present paper. When relating a source text to the norms of the target culture, translators can opt for an ‘assimilationist’ approach by canceling the elements that are alien to the target culture, or opt for an adherence to source norms by retaining source-culture specific elements. These two basic strategies lie at the two ends of a continuum. In fact what translators do in practice is to mitigate these two extremes by finding some sort of compromise so that the text would function for the target language audience in a maximally similar way as the original did for the source language audience and at the same time keeping as much as possible of its informational and pragmatic content. Consequently, we will also investigate the strategies employed by Romanian subtitlers and Hungarian dubbing translators in terms of a source language - target language continuum.
Our analysis will present and discuss various translation solutions for certain categories of verbally expressed humour. Since, subtitling is the predominant form of audiovisual translations in Romania, while Hungary is a dubbing country we analyze the Romanian subtitled version and the Hungarian dubbed version of the animated film Chicken Run. The film is closely examined and various translation solutions are presented. The analysis investigates the differences and similarities between the Romanian and Hungarian versions, and looks for any possible generalizations that might be of any help to translators when it comes to the challenging task of translating verbal humour. The examples will provide the source language text, the Hungarian and Romanian versions and their backtranslation.
The most frequent source of verbal humour in the film is wordplay. Delabastita defines wordplay as a “textual phenomena” contrasting “linguistic structures with different meanings on the basis of their formal similarity” (Jaskanen 51-52.) One aspect of wordplay and translation that many researchers have approached is whether wordplay is translatable at all, since it depends so strongly on the structure of the source language for meaning and effect.
The translation strategies for puns suggested by Delabastita (qtd. in Asimakoulas) include the following: (a) translating the source text wordplay with wordplay in the target text, which may be more or less different; (b) translating it in a way that loses some aspect of the wordplay; (c) replacing it with some other device aimed at creating similar effect (e.g. rhyme, irony); (d) source text pun copied as target text pun, without being translated; (e) or omitting it.
The reasons for omission may be language specific when there are elements in the source text that do not have corresponding linguistic elements in the target language; media specific when the time and space limitations of subtitling affect the translation; or due to the human translator, through insufficient talent, interest, experience or time.
However if it is impossible to translate a certain occurrence of verbal humor due to language, culture or medium constraints translators can opt for a compensatory strategy by inserting a pun where there was none or making use of other humour-inducing devices.
Chicken Run, the title of the film is a taste of what is to come. While ‘chicken run’ means an area surrounded by a fence where one keeps chickens, the interpretation of ‘run’ as a verb makes an allusion to the ‘escape’ reading as well. Of course this second possible interpretation is available only when one becomes acquainted with the plot. Therefore this wordplay does not rely solely on language factors. However, it is worth looking at the Hungarian and Romanian translations: the Hungarian Csibefutam translates only the second interpretation, while the Romanian Evadare din coteţ translates both the ’escape’ (evadare) and the place where chicken are kept (coteţ.)
(1) is among the first wordplays in the film. Nick, one of the rats, activates the ‘behind’ meaning of after, using the expression ‘after you’ as an incentive for Fetcher to leave. Fetcher, the other rat, processes a different meaning of after, the ‘subsequent in time to’ and poses a question based on that interpretation. It is the incongruity between the two meanings that gives rise to humour. Since both Hungarian and Romanian language make use of the word after in both senses (relating to space, and relating to time) translators opt for the source-language strategy but due to the inflectional nature of the two languages it is only the space related meaning of after that gets activated. Consequently, the humorous effect is somewhat reduced as aspects of the wordplay are lost.
(1) Eng. Ro. Hu.
N: After you, Fetcher. După dumneatea, Fetcher! Csak utánad Csali[1].
After you, Fetcher! After you, Fetcher.
F: After I what? După mine, ce? Mi van utánam?
After me what? What is after me?
(2) Eng.
F: Pushy Americans, always showing up late for every war: overpaid, over sexed and over here.
Ro.
F: Americanii băgăcioşi, apar la sfârşitul fiecărui război, super-plătiţi, super-alintaţi şi acum vin peste noi.
Meddlesome Americans, they show up at the end of each war, extra paid, extra spoilt and now they are over here.
Hu.
F: Törtető Amcsik, minden háborúba későn lépnek be. Hogy éppen egy renyhe Yankee kössön egy ilyen heLYEN ki.[2]
Pushy Americans(slang form), they enter each war belatedly. The only thing this place needs is a sluggish Yankee.
(2) is a remark made by British rooster Fowler referring to Rocky, the American rooster. This is an example of a pun embedded in a larger string of words. The mechanism that gives rise to humour in the source text is in fact similar to the one in (1.) Fowler activates two different meanings of over: ‘extremely’ in overpaid and over sexed, and ‘to one's place of residence’ in over here. The humor comes from the sudden introduction of a new meaning of over in an enumeration in which the elements preserve the same form. The unexpectedness of the change in meaning gives rise to humour. In order to translate this wordplay the translator would need an expression in the target language meaning ‘to one's place of residence,’ consisting of two words the first of which would also mean ‘extremely,’ and used as such in combination with other words as their first element. As pointed out earlier in such a similarity between languages is inconceivable. And indeed neither Hungarian nor Romanian makes use of such an expression. Consequently it becomes the translator’s dilemma to rewrite the humour in such a way that it has a similar effect on the target language audience as the source text had on the source language viewers. The Romanian subtitler chooses to render the informational and pragmatic content of the passage at the expense of the humour-inducing effect. He keeps as much as possible of the source text form. He uses the word super in the similar way as over is used with the first two elements, but since, super does not match the third element the translator opts for omitting the pun altogether. On the other hand the Hungarian dubbing translator retains only part of the meaning of the sentence altering the informational contents in such a way that it would function in a maximally similar way as the original did for the source language audience. In view of the fact that the source text wordplay is impossible to translate into the target language the dubbing translator replaces it with another device in order to create a similar effect. The natural stress pattern of the word helyen is changed and when read together with the word ki the output is identical to Yankee. This genuinely creative strategy of repeating the English word by a Hungarian word combination makes it possible to render the humour-inducing effect of the source text.
(3) Eng.
R: The name's Rocky. .
Rocky the Rhode Island Red. Rhodes for short.
Ch: Rocky Rhodes?
R: Mă cheama Rocky.
My name is Rocky
Rocky, Roşcatul din Rhode Island. Prescurtat-Rhodes.
Rocky, the Rhode Island Redhead. Rhodes for short
R: A nevem Rocky.
Rocky, a Rikitó Rakéta. Riki Raki.
Rocky, the Piercing Rocket. Riki Raki (short for Piercing Rocket)
Ch: Rocky Riki Raki?
In (3) Rocky introduces himself creating the pun Rocky Rhoads. When rendering this pun to the target language the Romanian subtitler opted for a source-culture oriented translation solution incorporating the source language wordplay unchanged into the target language text. There is only a slight change in the conversational exchange - Red is changed to Redhead- otherwise the subtitler chooses to copy the source text pun as target text pun. The Hungarian dubbing translator moves towards the target-culture end of the continuum, and once again decides in favour of a compensatory strategy for the lost wordplay. Humour is created on the phonetic level by repeating the same sounds in slightly altered combinations (mostly by alternating vowels.) This inventive strategy is carried on for one more conversational exchange thus increasing the humorous effect.
In (4) the translators are faced with the highly challenging task of translating a cultural element which is based on a pun on Attila the Hun. Since neither Hungarian nor Romanian has the formal similarity between the words Hun and hen, the epithet Attila the Hen does not exist in the two target cultures. Finding this complex element impossible to translate both translators choose a culturally neutral solution in order to replace the wordplay, and in so doing they also reduce the humorous effect.
(4)Eng.
N: Fetcher, let's see if our Attila the Hen has come to her senses.
N: Fetcher, să vedem dacă prietena noastră şi-a schimbat părerea.
Fetcher, let's see if our friend has changed her mind.
N: Te Csali, talán jobb belátásra tért az az észbontott csirke.
Fetcher, perhaps that crazed chicken has come round.
(5)Eng.
G: Where there's a will, there's a way.
R: Couldn't agree more.
And I will be leaving that way.
G:Dacă vrei, poţi.
Where there's a will, there's a way.
R:Sunt total de acord.
I totally agree.
Iar eu voi pleca în acest mod.
And I will be leaving this way.
G: Ha akarod kikaparod.
You can scrape it if you want.
R: Ebben egyetértek.
I agree with that.
Megyek is és kikaparom innen magam.
I’ll go and scrape myself out of here.
(5) is a complex issue. Ginger makes use of an idiom in order to convince Rocky to help them escape, but Rocky announces his intention to leave making use of the components of the idiom –the words will and way- to create a wordplay. The humor of the passage relies on Rocky’s wordplay. This seemingly untranslatable conversational exchange poses a real challenge for the translators. The probability of finding an idiomatic expression carrying the same meaning as the source idiom and having a polysemous component which may serve as a basis for wordplay, would have been highly unlikely both in Hungarian and Romanian. Thus, it is again the translators’ creativity that is put to work. The Romanian subtitler uses the current target-language equivalent for the idiom at the expense of the humorous effect. The Hungarian dubbing translator modifies Ginger’s words in such a way that Rocky’s interpretation can give rise to incongruity. The funniness of the Hungarian version lies in the activation of the literal meaning of ‘to scrape’ (kikapar) as opposed to the metaphoric meaning intended by Ginger. Yet, the humourous effect is somewhat weaker than what the source language expression might achieve in the source culture.
The examples discussed so far invariably tested translators’ capacity for making creative solutions when faced with the challenging task of exporting humor across cultural and linguistic barriers. However, owing to the audiovisual quality of the medium, subtitlers’ and dubbing translators’ latitude is often bound by the image. (6) and (7) illustrate cases of humour relying on the interplay of word and image. This comes to illustrate that verbal humour cannot b...
Maeveric