m2412093.pdf

(123 KB) Pobierz
Microsoft Word - MJA_A2_DWU_PRO2004.doc
Miejsce na nalepkħ
z kodem szkoþy
PRìBNY EGZAMIN
MATURALNY
Z JĦZYKA ANGIELSKIEGO
W KLASACH DWUJĦZYCZNYCH
ARKUSZ II
ROK 2004
Uzyskane punkty
liczba
uzyskanych
punktw
Rozumienie tekstu czytanego
5.
maksymalna
liczba
punktw
Arkusz II
Czas pracy 150 minut
Instrukcja dla zdajĢcego
1. Proszħ sprawdzię, czy arkusz egzaminacyjny zawiera 16
stron. Ewentualny brak naleŇy zgþosię przewodniczĢcemu
zespoþu nadzorujĢcego egzamin.
2. Obok kaŇdego zadania podana jest maksymalna liczba
punktw, ktrĢ moŇna uzyskaę za jego poprawne
rozwiĢzanie.
3. Za rozwiĢzanie wszystkich zadaı moŇna otrzymaę þĢcznie
60 punktw.
4. NaleŇy pisaę czytelnie, tylko w kolorze niebieskim
lub czarnym.
5. Oceniany jest tylko czystopis pracy pisemnej. Bþħdne
zapisy naleŇy wyraŅnie przekreĻlię. Nie wolno uŇywaę
korektora ani oþwka.
nr
zad.
15
6.
15
WypowiedŅ pisemna
7.
Poziom
meryt.
7
Poziom
komp.
7
Bogactwo
jħz.
8
Popraw.
jħz.
8
Suma 60
ņyczymy powodzenia!
(Wpisuje zdajĢcy przed rozpoczħciem pracy)
PESEL ZDAJġCEGO
28369760.004.png 28369760.005.png 28369760.006.png 28369760.007.png 28369760.001.png
READING COMPREHENSION
TASK 5. (15 points)
Read the following extract from a magazine article and answer questions (5.1.-5.15.) in
the spaces provided. Be as brief as possible. Use your own words.
THE SWEAT AND THE STUPOR IN THE GYM
Whatever they do to the body, gyms are certainly numbingly bad for your mind. This is not
simply the partisan judgement of a self-vindicating slob. The biggest problem that the fitness
industry faces is retaining club members, who, when their original zeal wears off, get bored
with all the lonely and repetitious rituals. To combat the threat of boredom, gyms have
installed distracting televisions and (in the posher ones) Internet connections to entertain
toilers on bikes and rowing machines, whose efforts can only be compared to those of the
mythological Sisyphus. Most chains have devised zany-sounding exercise classes to bedazzle
flagging members. LA Fitness in North London, like most others, offers a range of
unpronounceable varieties of yoga: Astanga, Iyenga, Sivananda, and so on.
At the plusher end of the market, the techniques deployed against boredom are much
more elaborate. After a generous recovery time following his first attempt Î and a more
substantial lunch than was technically advisable Î this correspondent subjects himself to one
such elaboration at the Third Space, a swanky gym in Soho. With membership costing around
¢1,000 a year, the Third Space is not quite LondonÓs priciest outfit, but is probably the most
chic. He heads for the clubÓs full-sized boxing ring for an hourÓs instruction with Martin, a
charismatic and patient professional light welterweight. Martin assures him that learning to
box is a good way to get fit (the possibility of concussion notwithstanding), and one which is
surprisingly popular with women. Martin doesnÓt seem to mind Î or perhaps he doesnÓt notice
Î when his pupil breaks a promise to go easy on him, accidentally biffing him on the chin.
Martin graciously allows that your correspondent could indeed be a contender, though
suggests he comes down a few weight divisions before turning professional.
The boxing ring, which hosts regular Ðfight-clubÑ nights for effeminate city and media
types, is Î says Ollie Vigors, a co-founder of the Third Space Î one of the ways in which the
gym tries to differentiate itself, and keep its visitors entertained. Mr Vigors includes bowling
alleys and bars, as well as other gyms, among its competitors. Other features designed to give
the Third Space the edge include an altitude-controlled running chamber; a reduced chlorine
swimming pool in which members can learn to scuba dive; a climbing wall; and the
opportunity to be serenaded by DJS or (on Sunday mornings) a gospel choir while you work
out. There is also on-site alternative therapy, including linguistic and mental Ðneuro-linguistic
programmingÑ and other offerings from the outer reaches of medicine and the English
language.
Many American gyms, especially those in New York, have devised even more
unlikely and exotic novelties to dispel the danger of somebody falling asleep. In New YorkÓs
gyms, experimental exercisers can work-out by pretending to be fire-fighters; participate in a
Ðstriptease aerobicsÑ class (not an activity likely to appeal to beginners); or engage in the
oxymoronic Ðboot camp yogaÑ. Rick Caro, who runs Management Vision Inc, a specialist
American consultancy, says that as the fitness business becomes more competitive Î and with
mini-gyms opening in , among other places, airports and shopping malls Î more and more
facilities are carving out specialist niches for themselves. Mr Caro believes that group work-
outs are one of the best ways to counteract boredom (partly because wavering participants can
see that some other people are in a worse shape than they are).
So what, this sweating scribbler continues to ask himself, are the compensations of a
pastime whose physical benefits are variable, and which is so dull that all manner of
improbable hybrids and gimmicks have to be invented to keep people at it? Why do hordes of
already-fit people devote so much of their time to such a boring and self-punitive pursuit?
Most other forms of entertainment that have evolved with mass affluence Î such as, say, the
rise of foreign holidays Î are more obviously enjoyable. Indeed, one theory of Anglo-
American capitalism argues that, at a certain point, the puritanism that originally sustained it
evaporated, to be replaced by an immature and self-indulgent hedonism; at that point pleasure
replaced hard work as capitalismÓs ultimate good. If this is true, then what explains this
masochistic tendency to keep getting fit?
The New Puritans, ÒThe EconomistÓ, Dec. 21 st , 2002, pp. 100-101
5.1. What kind of person is likely to form a biased opinion of the gymsÓ influence on oneÓs
brains?
5.2. Through Greek mythology, Sisyphus has come to symbolise making tiring, repetitive
effort which produces little result. Why is his name mentioned to describe the gym users (the
first paragraph)?
5.3. What is it that fitness chains hope to achieve through giving their classes names like
ÒAstangaÓ or ÒIyengaÓ?
5.4. What makes the Third Space an outstanding gym centre in London?
5.5. Explain why, according to the narrator, boxing is not an entirely effective way to stay
healthy.
5.6. What is MartinÓs advice regarding the narratorÓs possible career as a boxer?
5.7. What do representatives of media and the city frequenting fight-club nights lack
according to the author?
28369760.002.png
5.8. Give two main reasons why the Third Space offers a wide variety of sophisticated get-fit
attractions to its visitors.
5.9. What is an Òalternative therapyÓ offered by the Third Space like?
5.10. What are the unusual attractions like pretending to be a fire-fighter supposed to sustain?
5.11. An oxymoron is a device in which two completely opposite, and even contradictory,
words are put together. According to the narrator, Òboot camp yogaÓ is an oxymoron. Explain
what makes it so.
5.12. Explain why group work-outs are more effective in preventing monotony.
5.13. Summarise in your own words the double paradox of get-fit as a pastime as suggested in
the first question (the last paragraph).
5.14. Explain why the get-fit craze is described as a Òself-punitive pursuitÓ (the last
paragraph).
5.15. Why do the changes in the attitude to puritanism fail to explain the phenomenon of the
get-fit craze?
TASK 6. (15 points)
Read the following newspaper article. For questions (6.1.-6.8.) choose the answer (A, B,
C or D) which you think fits best according to the text and circle the appropriate letter.
Then answer questions 6.9.-6.15. Use your own words.
28369760.003.png
WHY ÒTHE OFFICEÓ APPEALS TO THE AMERICANS
1. Ricky Gervais has made history, with a double win at the Golden Globes, the
US television and film awards ceremony which, until this little coup anyway, appeared to
exist mainly as a dress rehearsal for the Oscars. Our hero picked up best actor, musical or
comedy series, while The Office, which he co-wrote as well as starred in, won best musical or
comedy series.
2. There was our boy Î pudgy, beard a different colour to his hair, funny, squeaky
voice Î being handed trophies by the gorgeous lollipop women of Hollywood. Fantastic.
Britain may claim that it resents being AmericaÓs poodle. But an enthusiastic tickle on the
tummy from any US institution sure feels swell.
3. Mr Gervais responded to his great honour in typically British style, with a
reported comment that sounds not unlike something his comic creation David Brent might
come up with. ÐIÓm not from these parts,Ñ he explained to his glittering audience. ÐIÓm from a
little place called England. We used to run the world before you.Ñ
4. IÓd like to hope that the audience laughed uproariously at this, recognising that
these faux-modest, passive-aggressive clichs are much of a muchness with the rot lobbed at
the unhappy team at Mr BrentÓs office. I certainly hope this was the spirit in which Mr
Gervais intended his comments too, because any other explanation Î like the guy being much
more like his creation than is bearable Î is hard to face.
5. Not, of course, that it really matters. David Brent is an amazing character, and
The Office was a wonderful show. ItÓs an interesting tribute to its brilliance as well, since one
could be forgiven for imagining that it was somehow very English, that its appeal seems to
cross the Atlantic so seamlessly. The Office may be set in a nondescript corner of Slough. But
while we all knew that it could just as easily have been set in Motherwell, or in the City of
London, itÓs a real tribute to the strengths of the show that the very same goes for Des Moines
or Austin.
6. As far as the culture is concerned, these awards are no mean feat for Gervais.
For years now, the US has been acknowledged as the worldÓs richest source of quality
television comedy. Shows from Cheers and Garry Shandling, through Frasier, Friends, Sex
and the City and the incomparable Simpsons, have maintained AmericaÓs position as the
funniest country in the West.
7. All of these behemoths have run for many series, scripted by large and
constantly replenished teams of writers. The Office, by contrast, was written by a two-man
team who had the guts to pull the plug after only a comparatively tiny number of episodes.
Such ruthless discipline certainly puts the wailing and gnashing of teeth accompanying the
final series of Sex and the City and Friends into perspective, since both programmes in fact
managed to flog scenarios about groups of young people into middle age. As for Frasier Î
will they still be making that programme when Kelsey GrammarÓs corpse has to be propped
up in the penthouse? Who knows? No-one, surely, is still watching.
8. But while it is almost breathtaking that The Office quit while it was still so very
far ahead, it is also amazing that it made its mark so soon. Most of the US programmes feted
so much, took a couple of series to really get into its stride. Sex and the City even took a while
to get its much-celebrated wardrobe sorted out. The fact that The Office lasted such a brief
time though, only adds to its allure. Modest as it is, the show really does stand up well to such
dazzling competition.
9. It is, of course, that accuracy of the portrayal of the human interactions in The
Office that makes it such blissful watching. From the very beginning, viewers recognised the
peculiar infantilisation of office life, with deadly turf wars being fought over staplers or desk
encroachment. We may have rooted for Tim, who always won, and despised Gareth, who
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin