Colour variation in blue dun Polish Konik and Bilgoraj horses.pdf

(575 KB) Pobierz
Livestock Production Science 90 (2004) 201–209
www.elsevier.com/locate/livprodsci
Colour variation in blue dun Polish Konik and Bilgoraj horses
Anna Stachurska a, * , Miros
aw Pi˛ta b , Zbigniew Jaworski c , Anne P. Ussing d ,
Agnieszka Bru´niak a , Mariusz Florek e
l
a
Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, Agricultural University,
13 Akademicka str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland
b Department of Sheep and Goat Breeding, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, Agricultural University,
13 Akademicka str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland
c Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Postepu str., 05-552 W´ lka Kosowska, Poland
d The Danish National Library of Science and Medicine, 49 Nørre All´, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
e Department of Animal Raw Material Estimation and Utilization, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, Agricultural University,
13 Akademicka str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Received 30 January 2003; received in revised form 29 April 2004; accepted 29 April 2004
Abstract
The study was conducted to determine the variability of the blue dun colour of Polish Konik and Bilgoraj Horses and to
define which factors involve the variations. These horses descend from Tarpans, wild horses, which are extinct. Hair samples
were cut from the horse’s back and their measures of lightness, redness and yellowness were recorded according to international
procedures (CIE L*a*b*).
The results show that in winter the blue dun coat is lighter, less red and more yellow than in summer. The differences are
more distinct in horses living in forest reserves than in horses living in stables. This suggests that the blue dun colour may be a
protective feature. Mares are generally lighter than stallions, foals are lighter than adults. Differences were also found between
Polish Konik and Bil C goraj populations and between two Polish Konik studs. Light blue dun individuals are simultaneously the
most yellow, whereas dark blue duns are the least yellow and the least red. Minolta Chroma Meter (CR-310) comes out to be
useful for measuring the hair colour. Particular L* and b* ranges are suggested to be the most typical for the shades. They
should help the breeders to qualify correctly the shade in a blue dun horse.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Polish Konik Horse; Coat hair colour; Blue dun; Shade; Adaptation
1. Introduction
(Pruski, 1959) . Old chronicles tell about bands of wild
blue dun (mousecoloured) horses with dorsal stripe,
living in forest zones in this European region. Most of
the horses were of a dark shade, but in some sources
very light, almost white horses are also mentioned
The Polish Konik’s gene pool is preserved in order
not
goraj Horse
originate from the Tarpan, the last wild horse living in
Middle–East Europe until the end of the 18th century
Primitive Polish Konik Horse and Bil
C
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +48-81-4456072; fax: +48-81-
5333549.
E-mail address: nowina@ursus.ar.lublin.pl (A. Stachurska).
to loose the biodiversity of the species. The
Bi
l
goraj Horse is not included in Polish Konik breed-
0301-6226/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.04.002
1108259112.101.png 1108259112.111.png 1108259112.122.png 1108259112.133.png
 
202
A. Stachurska et al. / Livestock Production Science 90 (2004) 201–209
ing but it is bred with extensive use of Polish Konik
sires. Both the Polish Konik and the Bi
a shade which appears as the intermediate between blue
dun and yellow dun. The latter, having a yellowish cast,
is probably the same as the American olive dun. It is
scarce in Polish horses and it seems to change slightly
towards the standard shade with the age of the animal.
The light shaded horses are sometimes nearly white
with black stripe and mixed black, grey and white mane
and tail, whereas dark blue dun horses may resemble
blacks. The nearly black individuals have a weak
greyish cast and the dorsal stripe still recognisable.
According to this distinction of shades, 9.7% of Polish
Koniks are dark shaded, 75.4% are standard, 14.6% are
light and 0.3% yellow-shaded blue dun ( Stachurska
and Brodacki, 2003b) .
The model of blue dun colour inheritance is known
1977; Craig and Van Vleck, 1985) . The blue dun
results from the activity of A, E and D loci. Dominant
D allele dilutes black (aaE _ ) into blue dun (aaE _ D _ ).
It is still not documented what causes its differentia-
The colour shade of blue dun horses is recorded in
the Polish Konik Stud Book, so it is assumed to be a
rather constant property. Preliminary studies on the
coat hair colour in blue dun primitive horses were
performed with the use of a leukometer, which only
allows for a relative comparison (Stachurska et al.,
2001) . It seems important to document the hair colour
changes by absolute recording. In some horses it is
difficult to determine the colour shade. Human visual
perception is usually influenced by the average colour
in the stud. For instance, a horse of a medium shade
between light and standard will be determined as
standard if the stud consists generally of light-shaded
horses or light if standard-shaded horses predominate.
The body colour is one of the most important characters
of the shade and an accurate means of measuring it may
enable comparison of colour shades between studs.
The objectives of the study were to define the range
of variability in coat colour of blue dun Polish Konik
and Bil
goraj Horses
inherited the colour from the Tarpan. Red dun and
black foals which appear from time to time in the
populations are excluded from the breeding
It is thought that the blue dun colour is a protective
colouring, which once helped the wild horses to
escape predators. Vetulani (1946) and Kownacki
(1962) observed that Polish Koniks became lighter
during winter and darkened in summer. This property
also could have helped their ancestors to survive in
wild. Lighter horses are less visible in the snow while
darker ones are less noticeable in the summer. More-
over, dark colour quickly absorbs sunrays but simul-
taneously the heat is easier eliminated from dark
surface, which is desired in hot weather (Cena et al.,
1952) . Light colour retains the heat longer and thus it
may be advantageous when it is cold.
Blue dun horses have a grey body, often with a light
brownish cast, though the colour in a population may
vary from whitish grey through grey with a yellowish,
reddish or silvery cast to almost black (Stachurska,
1997) . The head colour is either darker, or similar to,
but never lighter than the body colour. The lower legs
are darker than the body. Mane and tail consist of
strands of variously coloured hair: from white through
cream and grey, to black. Generally, the mane and tail
are darker than, or the same colours, as the body. All
blue duns have a black or dark grey dorsal stripe
(Stachurska, 1997, 1999) . It is usually accompanied
by horizontal small bars on legs and sometimes by
stripes and spots on other parts of the body.
Such a strong individual variation of the blue dun
colour involved categorising it into shades. Sponen-
berg (1996) distinguishes five blue dun modifications:
the lightest silvery so-called grullo, the medium slate
grullo, the dark grullo, the lobo dun with sooty black
countershading on dorsal areas and the olive dun with
the yellowish cast to the body colour. In Polish Konik
and Bil
l
goraj Horses the lobo dun variation does not
occur. The blue dun colour occurs with a percentage
of 9.8 in the Norwegian Fjord Horse (Nestaas, 1996) .
In this breed, lighter coloured horses were favoured in
the breeding programme, thus leading to very light
varieties of among others blue dun (Ussing, 2000) .
In Poland, regarding mainly the trunk colour, four
blue dun shades are identified: light, standard, dark and
C
goraj Horses, as well as to analyse the effect on
the colour variation of some non-genetic factors.
C
2. Material and methods
The study was conducted on 159 blue dun Polish
Konik horses maintained in two breeding centres:
A. Stachurska et al. / Livestock Production Science 90 (2004) 201–209
203
Popielno and Zwierzyniec, as well as 30 blue dun
Bil
horse groups distinguished according to these factors,
the least square analysis of variance was used:
goraj Horses from the Jan´w Lubelski centre. In
the three centres, horses are kept under similar con-
ditions, either stabled with daily access to pastures, or
free-ranging in forest reserves. Altogether, 479 hair
samples were taken: 169 samples from stabled horses
and 310 samples from free-ranging horses. The sam-
ples were taken through 2 years, in January and
February (221 samples) and in June and July (258
samples). In Poland, the spring shedding in Polish
Konik horses living in reserves begins in December
and lasts until April, whereas in autumn the shedding
occurs from the ultimo August till half of October
(Detkens, 1967) . Hence, hair samples were taken from
the same horses’ winter and summer coat, respective-
ly. Each hair sample was cut with a razor from the
dorsal side of a horse. The shade of the horse was
recorded at the same time.
The hair samples were cut into small pieces for
colour readings. The underhairs, if they occurred,
were not separated from outerhairs, since their colour
and structure were alike. The readings were taken with
the use of a Minolta Chroma Meter CR-310 colori-
meter with a 50-mm-diameter measurement area, in
the L*a*b* colour space (CIE, 1976) . The reflectance
spectrophotometry enables to calculate the CIE tri-
stimulus values (X, Y, Z), which after mathematical
transformations into L, a* and b* coordinates metri-
cally describe the colour’s position on the chromatic
circle. L* means the lightness, a* redness and b*
yellowness. The three coordinates together approxi-
mate human colour perception.
In order to find the typical colour coordinates for
each shade, the horses were ranged into three lists
according to increasing L*, a* and b* values. Then,
they were divided into groups in which approximately
45–50% of individuals were of a given shade.
The hair colour was examined with regard to (1)
the season of the year, (2) the type of maintenance
(stabled or free-ranging), (3) gender, (4) age, (5) breed
(meaning Polish Konik breed and close Bil
C
Y ijklmn ¼ l þ S i þ G j þ A k þ B l þ D m þ e ijklmn
where Y ijklmn is the trait value; l the overall mean; S i
the season of the year combined with the type of
maintenance (i = 4; summer—stabled horses, winter—
stabled horses, summer—free-ranging horses, win-
ter—free-ranging horses), G j the gender ( j = 3; mares,
stallions, geldings), A k the age (k = 6; suckling foals,
yearlings, 2-year-olds, 3-year-olds, 4–9-year-olds, 10-
year-olds and older horses), B l the breed (l = 2; Polish
Koniks, Bil
goraj Horses) and D m the colour shade
(m = 3; light blue dun, standard blue dun, dark blue
dun), e ijklmn the random error.
Another analysis of variance was made to compare
Polish Konik Horses among themselves in the two
breeding centres (405 hair samples). The breed factor
(B l ) was replaced by C l the breeding centre (l =2;
Popielno, Zwierzyniec). Since the results of the anal-
ysis showed the same tendencies with regard to the
previously considered factors, only the part
concerning the breeding centres was presented in the
study.
L*, a* and b* linear regression (b yx ) was estimated
for the stabled horses, the free-ranging horses and for
all the horses thrown together, to determine how the
summer values changed in winter.
C
3. Results
The observed L*, a* and b* values ranged between
32.83–71.95, 1.05–5.40 and 1.31–15.58, respec-
tively. The distinction into groups, in which approx-
imately half of the individuals were of a given shade,
is presented in Table 1 . For instance, in horses of
L*< 47.5, 45.9% of individuals were dark shaded and
54.1% were standard. Some of the dark shaded horses
had L* higher than 47.5 but they were less and less
numerous. b* ranges for light shaded horses were not
distinguished since among horses of b*>4.9, all
shades were mixed on the list. It was not possible to
distinguish respective a* ranges for variously shaded
horses, either, because all three shades were spread
over the whole list.
goraj
population) and (6) registered colour shade. The
visually determined colour shade was taken into
consideration to compare it with the colorimeter read-
ings. Three yellow shaded horses were excluded from
the analysis.
To estimate the influence of the factors on the
colour parameters, as well as to compare the results in
C
204
A. Stachurska et al. / Livestock Production Science 90 (2004) 201–209
Table 1
Percentage of variously shaded blue dun horses within groups
distinguished by suggested hair colour coordinate ranges
L*
Table 2
L*a*b* linear regression (b yx ; y—winter, x—summer)
Horses
n
L*
a*
b*
Distinguished groups
Mainly dark
up to 47.5
(15.4%;
N = 74)
Free-ranging
91 0.936 p < 0.01 0.377 p < 0.01 0.809 p < 0.01
Mainly
standard
47.5–61.5
(70.8%;
N = 339)
Mainly light
over 61.5
(13.8%;
N = 66)
Stabled
45 0.783 p < 0.01 0.276 p < 0.05 0.568 p < 0.01
Total
136 0.864 p < 0.01 0.390 p < 0.01 0.720 p < 0.01
Fig. 1 shows that within stabled or free-ranging
horses in the winter L* was higher than in the summer
( p < 0.01). In both seasons the free-ranging horses had
higher L* than the stabled horses ( p < 0.01). The coat
hairs showed similar L* values for free-ranging horses
in the summer as for stabled horses in the winter. The
a* coordinate was higher in summer than in winter
and higher in stabled horses than in free-ranging
horses ( p < 0.01). Simultaneously, in the summer both
stabled and free-ranging horses had lower b* values
than in the winter ( p < 0.01). Considering b*, stabled
and free-ranging horses differed only in the summer
( p < 0.01).
It should be noticed that 15% of the horses
(mainly the free-ranging) lightened so much during
winter that their shades were visually qualified one
level lighter than in summer. A few horses (2.5%)
changed their apparent shade from light or standard
Dark shaded horses
45.9%
10.3%
0.0%
Standard horses
54.1%
80.0%
50.0%
Light shaded horses
0.0%
9.7%
50.0%
b*
Mainly dark
up to 4.9
(20.5%;
N = 98)
Standard
and light
over 4.9
(79.5%,
N = 381)
Dark shaded horses
45.0%
6.6%
Standard horses
54.0%
76.1%
Light shaded horses
1.0%
17.3%
In general, the analysed factors significantly af-
fected the body hair L*a*b* coordinates. However,
a* value was not influenced by the horse’s gender,
age and breed, whereas b* was not affected by the
gender.
Fig. 1. Effect of season of year and environment on L*, a* and b* values of coat colour shade.
1108259112.011.png 1108259112.022.png 1108259112.033.png 1108259112.044.png 1108259112.055.png 1108259112.057.png 1108259112.058.png 1108259112.059.png 1108259112.060.png 1108259112.061.png 1108259112.062.png 1108259112.063.png 1108259112.064.png 1108259112.065.png 1108259112.066.png 1108259112.067.png 1108259112.068.png 1108259112.069.png 1108259112.070.png 1108259112.071.png 1108259112.072.png 1108259112.073.png 1108259112.074.png 1108259112.075.png 1108259112.076.png 1108259112.077.png 1108259112.078.png 1108259112.079.png 1108259112.080.png 1108259112.081.png 1108259112.082.png 1108259112.083.png 1108259112.084.png 1108259112.085.png 1108259112.086.png 1108259112.087.png 1108259112.088.png 1108259112.089.png 1108259112.090.png 1108259112.091.png 1108259112.092.png 1108259112.093.png 1108259112.094.png 1108259112.095.png 1108259112.096.png 1108259112.097.png 1108259112.098.png 1108259112.099.png 1108259112.100.png 1108259112.102.png 1108259112.103.png 1108259112.104.png
 
A. Stachurska et al. / Livestock Production Science 90 (2004) 201–209
205
Fig. 2. Effect of gender on L*, a* and b* values of coat colour shade.
in summer into yellow-shaded in winter. The linear
regression values for L*, a*andb* colour coor-
dinates are presented in Table 2 . Theyarea l
positive, significant and higher in the free-ranging
horses than in the stabled horses. The regression
value indicates how much a parameter changes on
Fig. 3. Effect of horse age on L*, a* and b* values of coat colour shade.
1108259112.105.png 1108259112.106.png 1108259112.107.png 1108259112.108.png 1108259112.109.png 1108259112.110.png 1108259112.112.png 1108259112.113.png 1108259112.114.png 1108259112.115.png 1108259112.116.png 1108259112.117.png 1108259112.118.png 1108259112.119.png 1108259112.120.png 1108259112.121.png 1108259112.123.png 1108259112.124.png 1108259112.125.png 1108259112.126.png 1108259112.127.png 1108259112.128.png 1108259112.129.png 1108259112.130.png 1108259112.131.png 1108259112.132.png 1108259112.134.png 1108259112.135.png 1108259112.136.png 1108259112.137.png 1108259112.138.png 1108259112.139.png 1108259112.140.png 1108259112.141.png 1108259112.142.png 1108259112.143.png 1108259112.001.png 1108259112.002.png 1108259112.003.png 1108259112.004.png 1108259112.005.png 1108259112.006.png 1108259112.007.png 1108259112.008.png 1108259112.009.png 1108259112.010.png 1108259112.012.png 1108259112.013.png 1108259112.014.png 1108259112.015.png 1108259112.016.png 1108259112.017.png 1108259112.018.png 1108259112.019.png 1108259112.020.png 1108259112.021.png 1108259112.023.png 1108259112.024.png 1108259112.025.png 1108259112.026.png 1108259112.027.png 1108259112.028.png 1108259112.029.png 1108259112.030.png 1108259112.031.png 1108259112.032.png 1108259112.034.png 1108259112.035.png 1108259112.036.png 1108259112.037.png 1108259112.038.png 1108259112.039.png 1108259112.040.png 1108259112.041.png 1108259112.042.png 1108259112.043.png 1108259112.045.png 1108259112.046.png 1108259112.047.png 1108259112.048.png 1108259112.049.png 1108259112.050.png 1108259112.051.png 1108259112.052.png 1108259112.053.png 1108259112.054.png 1108259112.056.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin