TheHighCostofVengeance.pdf

(1015 KB) Pobierz
Freda Utley, The High Cost of Vengeance
THE HIGH COST
OF
VENGEANCE
by
Freda Utley
HENRY REGNERY COMPANY
CHICAGO
1949
This book was made possible
by a research grant from the
FOUNDATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, WASHINGTON, D.C.
Copyright 1949
HENRY REGNERY COMPANY
Chicago, Illinois
Manufactured in the United States of America.
To My Dear Friends
John and Joan Crane
Whose Help and Encouragement
Have Been Invaluable
In the Writing of This Book
Table of Contents
CHAPTER
PAGE
48025178.002.png
162
182
211
232
271
302
Do not be seduced by the prospect of a
great alliance. Abstinence from all injustice
to other powers is a greater tower of strength
than anything that can be gained by the
sacrifice of permanent tranquility for
an apparent temporary advantage.
—THUCYDIDES, The Peloponnesian War.
48025178.003.png
Chapter 1
Road to War
Following World War I France and Britain refused to listen to the statesmen who said that you can have
peace or vengeance, not both. They broke their armistice pledge to Germany that peace would be made
on the basis of President Wilson's Fourteen Points and "the principles of settlement enunciated" by the
American President.* They continued the starvation blockade of Germany for six months after the
Armistice, in order to force the German democrats who had taken over the government to sign a dictated
peace. Having promised a peace without annexations or indemnities, they deprived Germany of territory
and imposed a crushing reparations burden on the newly established Weimar Republic.
Having promised general disarmament they disarmed Germany without disarming themselves. The
victors refused even to discuss the terms of peace with the vanquished who had surrendered on stated
conditions which were not fulfilled, and in general discredited democracy in German eyes by associating
it with broken pledges, national humiliation, and economic distress.
The Nazi movement, born from the dragon seeds planted at Versailles, and brought to monstrous growth
by the world depres-
* Referring to the Armistice, Maynard Keynes in 1919 wrote in his prophetic book The Economic Consequences
of the Peace : "The nature of the contract between Germany and the allies . . . is plain and unequivocal. The terms
of the peace are to be in accordance with the addresses of the President, and the purpose of the peace conference is
'to discuss the details of their applications.' The circumstances of the contract were of an unusually solemn and
binding character; for one of the conditions of it was that Germany should agree to Armistice Terms which were
to be such as would leave her helpless. . . . The honor of the allies was (thus) peculiarly involved in fulfilling their
part, and if there were ambiguities, in not using their position to take advantage of them."
1
sion which raised the total number of unemployed in Germany to six million, took power at the moment
of Europe's and America's greatest economic crisis. Inevitably, the second World War followed the first
after an interval of only twenty years.
Instead of learning that you cannot build confidence and security, democracy and prosperity, on a
foundation of hatred and vengeance, the victorious allies this time have torn Germany apart, deprived her
of all possibility of existence without exterior aid, and while unable to agree among themselves on a
peace treaty, have jointly reduced the defeated enemy country to the status of an African colony.
48025178.004.png
History is repeating itself with results likely to be even more tragic for Europe than the events which led
up to World War II. Once again the victorious allies are making it impossible for the Germans to place
their faith in democracy and justice, since they find justice denied and democracy mocked by the
occupying powers. Once again the German democrats are in danger of yielding right of way to the
totalitarians because legal methods and appeals to justice are again failing to obtain a fair deal for the
German people. Last time we produced Hitler; this time we may succeed in giving Stalin hegemony over
all Europe.
If France, following World War I, had been prepared to treat Germany as generously and intelligently as
England had treated France after Napoleon's defeat, Europe might have known another century of peace.
The long conflict between Germany and France could have ended on terms as advantageous to both, and
as conducive to European peace, as the Anglo-French collaboration which succeeded centuries of rivalry
and war between England and France. Instead, France sought a fictitious security by disarming the
Teutonic giant while giving him every reason to plot for revenge. The crushing burden of reparations the
Germans were required to pay, and the denial to Germany of a secure and honorable status among the
nations of Europe, so enfeebled German democracy that the Nazis won power and France was
overwhelmed by the forces she herself had created.
It may be true that the lesson to be learned from history is that mankind learns nothing from it. But the
explanation for the failure of the Western democracies to read the lesson of the immediate past seems
mainly due to the effect of war propaganda and the ignorance or lack of integrity of the molders of public
opinion.
The pen is still mightier than the sword and responsible for
2
more human misery when unscrupulously employed in "psychological warfare." As Samuel Johnson
wrote in the eighteenth century : "I know not whether more is to be feared from streets filled with
soldiers accustomed to plunder, or from garrets filled with scribblers accustomed to lie."
War propaganda, and the falsification of history indulged in by a multitude of journalists, authors,
professors, and politicians has convinced the American public that the Germans have a peculiar aversion
to democracy and are an innately aggressive people who will always attempt to rule the world unless
kept down and taught to love democracy by a long period of instruction in a reformatory.
Only those who have studied the history of Europe know that Germany did not become a militarist nation
until centuries of French aggression, from the days of Richelieu to Napoleon's conquests had caused a
reaction which enabled Prussia to forge the modern German state out of the disunited and powerless
congeries of kingdoms, principalities, and free cities, which constituted "the Germanies" before the
48025178.005.png
French Revolution.
Americans who have had it dinned into their ears for years that Germany has attacked France three times
within living memory will be astonished at reading what was said at the time in Britain and the United
States about the Franco-Prussian War.
The London Times on July 16, 1870, wrote as follows :
The greatest national crime that we have had the pain of recording in these columns since
the days of the First French Empire has been consummated. War is declared—an unjust
but premeditated war. The dire calamity, which overwhelms Europe with dismay, is, it is
now too clear, the act of France, of one man in France. It is the ultimate result of personal
rule.
There can be no doubt as to the side on which the world's sympathies will be enlisted, and,
whatever may on former occasions have been the offenses of Prussia, she will in this
instance have on her side all that moral support which is seldom denied to those who take
up arms in self-defense.*
George Bancroft, the U. S. Minister in Berlin, reported as follows :
The leading statesmen as well as public opinion America regard
* Cited in Gustav Stolper, German Realities (New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1948), p. 218.
3
the present war essentially as an act of self-defense on Germany's part, and the outstanding
task is to insure Germany permanently, by a better system of frontiers, against new wars of
aggression on the part of her western neighbors, of which the past three centuries have
brought so large a number.
The tragedy of modern history is that the Germans have always been kicked around when they were
pacifically minded, with the natural result that the apostles of violence have again and again won the
leadership of the nation, following the failure of the democrats and antimilitarists to win a fair deal for
the German people, or protect them from attack.
Having finally girded their loins to resist French aggression and forced France to abandon her centuries-
old ambition to establish her hegemony over the Continent, the Germans proceeded, once Bismarck's
48025178.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin