1843_Two Discourses On Prophecy (Miller critiques).pdf

(7782 KB) Pobierz
Two discourses on prophecy: with an appendix in which mr. [W.] Miller's scheme, concerning our Lord's second advent is considered and refuted
TWO
DISCOURSES
011
WITH
AN APPENDIX
m WHICH MR. MILLER'S SCHGIIIE, CONCERNING OW LOXD'I
BECOND ADVENT, IS CONBIDERED AND EEPUTED.
BY SAMUEL FARMAR JARVIS, D.D., LL.D.
hhlyto be the author of a false interpretathn of krlptun, b to taka God'#
nuus in vain, in s LLgb degree.-Jomrm MCDI.
NEW YORK:
PUBLISHED BY JAMES A. SPARKB,
No. 109 Nassau Btreet.
-
1&3.
139400868.002.png
Entered ding b the act d Collgmm, Ln the year 1843, by
JAMES A. BPABg8,
In the Clerk's of&e of the Diatrict Court for the Soutbern Distrjct of New York.
r w. mmmrm k w., PMNT.,
lPBPlll1011
C
139400868.003.png
TO THE HONORABLE JAMES KENT, LL.D.,
the
pleasantest day you had spent during your journey, you added : 6' But
do you know whet a load of responsibility the possession of there
books lays upon yon 7 You are bound to make known the treaewm
they contain, to your wuntrymen." Your words dwelt on my
memory, animated my exertions, and cheered me in the midst of toil
and trouble. And thongh circumstances have long prevented my
giving In the public any fruits of my labors, yet I hare been con-
stantly at work, and am now prepard to begin a series of pnbliea-
tions. Thia little volume may be considered as the fist fruits. To
whom can 1,dedicate it with more propriety than to yon 1 I hope
you will do me the favor to accept the offering, small though it be, M
a feeble tribute of that respect for your exalted character, and that
admiration of your profound learning, with which I have the honor
to remain,
Yoor grateful friend,
and faithfal ermnt,
THE AUTHOR.
&DDLETOWN, CONNEC~TCUT,
Jmc, 1843.
Yon doubtless have forgotten, though I never can forget, your
words to me in 1836, when yon pwed a morning in my library at
Washington College, in H'artford. After declaring that it ~.s
139400868.004.png
139400868.005.png
PREFACE:
THE AUTHORof these Discourses has been, for tbe last
three or four years, engaged in preparing for the prera
his introductory volume of Ecclesiastical History ; and
in order to adjust the dates of the birth and death of our
Lord Jesus Christ, he has been led to go rather largely
into a\n examination of ancient chronology. It is for
thia reaaon probably, that during the excitement occa-
sioned by the writings of Mr. Miller, and the preaching
of hiinself and his followers, on the second advent, the
author has been often asked for his opinion concerning
the calculations which have produced such extraordi-
nary results. Me was very unwilling to go into the
subject, for two reasons : first, because it would neces-
sarily, for a time, divert his thoughts from the principal
subject of his meditations; and secondly, because the
unerring hand of HIMwho, with regard to the future a41
well as the past, is his own interpreter, would soon allay
the ferment. But his re-erve and caution were misin-
terpreted. . Much to his surprise he learned, by letters
from various quarters, that Mr. Miller's preachers had
made use of his name,.and had asserted, to use their om
language, thnt he "agreed with Mr. Miller in believing
P
that the visions of Daniel ran out in 1843." He owed it,
therefore, to himself, and to the church whose servant
he is, publicly to contradict the calumny. He did thir,
139400868.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin